Introduction.
This section is to demonstrate by actual examples the way the book
makes its arguments.
You can either select the examples individually or scroll down and select
label "examples" and the whole section will be presented in one
sequential stream.
A verse or a sequence of verses is selected and immediately commented
on, the reader will therefore not have to look up anything in other books
- it is all clearly presented.
A total of around 1350 verses are quoted and analysed, almost 1000 for
the 5 Books of Moses and just over 350 for the 4 Gospels.
Should the reader be interested, both the Old and New Testaments that
were used for these studies can be downloaded free at www.wbtc.org.
All text in italics are Bible quotes, my comments are in plain text, and
bold is my emphasis.
As will be shown, there are no idle claims, all conclusions are based on
method and logic, and I challenge anyone, including chief rabbis and the
pope, to prove a single claim wrong.
Extensive cross-referencing is used to support arguments made.
The examples are presented exactly as in the book except that page
numbers have been removed for clarity.
These currently 6 examples represent approx 11 pages of excerpts.
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
For this section I have selected a few of the more startling findings,
which are highlighted in the 4 page Foreword, namely:
JUDAISM
> that all Arabs are not only Semitic, which we knew already,
but also Hebrew, probably as difficult to comprehend and accept
for the reader as for the writer, but the evidence is clear so the
conclusion is inevitable and indisputable.
(for the proof see Example J1)
> that Judaism explicitly forbids humans re-establishing Israel.
We found no less than 84 verses in the Five Books of Moses which
all tell the same story, and not one single verse contradicting it.
The consequences are clear: Zionist colonisers OUT of Palestine.
(for the proof see Example J2)
> that Judaism commands human sacrifice, to the God of Israel
Yahweh, who thereby indisputably is revealed to be the Jewish
equivalent of the Canaanite's Moloch, who is repeatedly and
absolutely condemned in the Law of Moses not only as a horrible
monster but also as a false god. It takes one to know one...
You may have to read that again, and slowly, but it is a sad
and dreadful undeniable fact of Judaism, until now generally
regarded as a dignified and noble religion. But truth will out.
(for the proof see Example J3)
CHRISTIANITY
> that Jesus forfeits his own right to eternal life, for he states
that in order to have eternal life we must obey the Law of Moses,
which he breaks himself repeatedly. Most amusing.
(for the proof see Example C1)
> that, although denied by Muslims, Jesus DOES claim to be the
son of God for we found no less than 31 verses in the 4 Gospels
that confirm it, and there are many more waiting to be listed.
(for the proof see Example C2)
> that Jesus wishes you a horrible death for no other reason than
rejecting his message, namely that you may perish in a holocaust
worse than the one inflicted upon Sodom and Gomorrah.
So much for the Prince of Peace. Lies, all lies.
(for the proof see Example C3)
*
Showing posts with label examples. Show all posts
Showing posts with label examples. Show all posts
21 February 2011
20 February 2011
Example J1
All Arabs are not only Semitic but also Hebrew.
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that all Arabs are not only Semitic, which we knew already,
but also Hebrew, probably as difficult to comprehend and accept
for the reader as for the writer, but the evidence is clear so the
conclusion is inevitable and indisputable.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- all Arabs are not only Semitic but also Hebrew?
> (Gen.10:21 + Gen.14:13)
And here is the proof:
Genesis 10
Shem’s Descendants
21 Shem was Japheth’s older brother. One of Shem’s
descendants was Eber, the father of all the Hebrew people.
[ERV note 10:21 - literally, To Shem was born the father of
Eber’s sons.]
And so we get to Shem - third time lucky, as they say. Did you
notice that in Gen.10:1 Noah's 3 sons were introduced in order of
birth, namely "Shem, Ham, and Japheth" but are then listed, with
their descendants, in reverse order. This is both interesting and
unusual and we would like to know why it was done that way.
Connecting "Eber" here with "Hebrew" is also interesting and
needs investigating, so here is the same verse from the KJV:
KJV.Gen.10:21 Unto Shem also, the father of all
the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder,
even to him were children born.
Nothing "Hebrew" here, so an explanation would be welcome.
After some research, the only link we can find is in the KJV, NT,
3rd Gospel, where Luke lists the family line of Jesus all the way
back to Adam (!), and the 4th generation after Shem is named
Heber and not Eber (NT.Lk.3:35), whereas in the ERV used here
his name is Eber. This is a very small and plausible difference, so
we accept the connection made in v.21 above. But it would be
nice to have further confirmation of this from other sources, as
we shall soon see how important this link is (Gen.14:13).
Genesis 14
13 One of the men who had escaped went to Abram the
Hebrew and told him what happened.
Abram described as a Hebrew, so confirming both Gen.10:21 as
regards Eber-Heber and the family line in Gen.11.
The KJV says the same:
KJV.Gen.14:13 And there came one that had escaped,
and told Abram the Hebrew...
This is VERY important: Abram, soon to be renamed Abraham
(=Ibraheem), is of the line of Noah's oldest son Shem, from
where we get Shemitic > Semitic. As we shall soon see, Abraham
had Ishmael with Hajjar (Hagar), Sarah's Egyptian slave woman,
and later Isaac with his formal wife Sarah.
Ishmael and Isaac are regarded as the ancestors of all Arabs and
all Jews, respectively, they are therefore all Semitic people, which
is why the term anti-Semitic, when used to counter anti-Jewish or
more frequently anti-Zionist and anti-Israel feelings, is idiotic and
meaningless, rather, it is wildly misleading and inaccurate.
Speak clearly please.
We say "all Jews" above and, scripturally speaking, that is of
course true and the Jews themselves would agree with that.
But as we just established in Gen.10, more than 90 percent of
those classified as "Jews" today are NOT Jews at all because
they are NOT descendants of the Semitic Hebrew named
Abram-Abraham.
What also follows logically from the above might be difficult both
to comprehend and accept, for Jews, Christians, Muslims and
Arabs alike, so read this slowly: if Abram was a Hebrew then,
in a scriptural sense at least, all Arabs are also Hebrews...
That being the case, Arabs have an equal claim to any "Hebrew"
heritage, be it divine promises or lands or whatever.
So why are the Jews, the few real ones and the many impostors,
keeping it all for themselves?
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that all Arabs are not only Semitic, which we knew already,
but also Hebrew, probably as difficult to comprehend and accept
for the reader as for the writer, but the evidence is clear so the
conclusion is inevitable and indisputable.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- all Arabs are not only Semitic but also Hebrew?
> (Gen.10:21 + Gen.14:13)
And here is the proof:
Genesis 10
Shem’s Descendants
21 Shem was Japheth’s older brother. One of Shem’s
descendants was Eber, the father of all the Hebrew people.
[ERV note 10:21 - literally, To Shem was born the father of
Eber’s sons.]
And so we get to Shem - third time lucky, as they say. Did you
notice that in Gen.10:1 Noah's 3 sons were introduced in order of
birth, namely "Shem, Ham, and Japheth" but are then listed, with
their descendants, in reverse order. This is both interesting and
unusual and we would like to know why it was done that way.
Connecting "Eber" here with "Hebrew" is also interesting and
needs investigating, so here is the same verse from the KJV:
KJV.Gen.10:21 Unto Shem also, the father of all
the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder,
even to him were children born.
Nothing "Hebrew" here, so an explanation would be welcome.
After some research, the only link we can find is in the KJV, NT,
3rd Gospel, where Luke lists the family line of Jesus all the way
back to Adam (!), and the 4th generation after Shem is named
Heber and not Eber (NT.Lk.3:35), whereas in the ERV used here
his name is Eber. This is a very small and plausible difference, so
we accept the connection made in v.21 above. But it would be
nice to have further confirmation of this from other sources, as
we shall soon see how important this link is (Gen.14:13).
Genesis 14
13 One of the men who had escaped went to Abram the
Hebrew and told him what happened.
Abram described as a Hebrew, so confirming both Gen.10:21 as
regards Eber-Heber and the family line in Gen.11.
The KJV says the same:
KJV.Gen.14:13 And there came one that had escaped,
and told Abram the Hebrew...
This is VERY important: Abram, soon to be renamed Abraham
(=Ibraheem), is of the line of Noah's oldest son Shem, from
where we get Shemitic > Semitic. As we shall soon see, Abraham
had Ishmael with Hajjar (Hagar), Sarah's Egyptian slave woman,
and later Isaac with his formal wife Sarah.
Ishmael and Isaac are regarded as the ancestors of all Arabs and
all Jews, respectively, they are therefore all Semitic people, which
is why the term anti-Semitic, when used to counter anti-Jewish or
more frequently anti-Zionist and anti-Israel feelings, is idiotic and
meaningless, rather, it is wildly misleading and inaccurate.
Speak clearly please.
We say "all Jews" above and, scripturally speaking, that is of
course true and the Jews themselves would agree with that.
But as we just established in Gen.10, more than 90 percent of
those classified as "Jews" today are NOT Jews at all because
they are NOT descendants of the Semitic Hebrew named
Abram-Abraham.
What also follows logically from the above might be difficult both
to comprehend and accept, for Jews, Christians, Muslims and
Arabs alike, so read this slowly: if Abram was a Hebrew then,
in a scriptural sense at least, all Arabs are also Hebrews...
That being the case, Arabs have an equal claim to any "Hebrew"
heritage, be it divine promises or lands or whatever.
So why are the Jews, the few real ones and the many impostors,
keeping it all for themselves?
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
19 February 2011
Example J2
Judaism explicitly forbids humans re-establishing Israel.
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that Judaism explicitly forbids humans re-establishing Israel.
We found no less than 84 verses in the Five Books of Moses which
all tell the same story, and not one single verse contradicting it.
The consequences are clear: Zionist colonisers OUT of Palestine.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- Judaism explicitly forbids humans re-establishing Israel?
> Gen.28:15 + Deut.19:8 + Deut.30:3-4 + Appendix J2
(list of 84 cases)
And here is the proof:
(here we present only a few of those 84 verses but these are some
of the clearest and most emphatic and on their own are already
sufficient as proof but of course all the others reinforce the case)
Genesis 28
[Lord to Jacob:]
15 I am with you, and I will protect you everywhere you go.
I will bring you back to this land.
I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised.
And because this is ultra-important, here is the KJV:
KJV.Gen.28:15 And, behold, I am with thee, and will keep thee
in all places whither thou goest, and will bring thee again into
this land; for I will not leave thee, until I have done that which
I have spoken to thee of.
HA! WE GOT THEM NOW! We really have got them now -
we have found what we were sincerely hoping to find.
Read that again, and at least 3 times, for this, Gen.28:15, is
possibly the most important single verse out of the Yahweh-only-
knows-how-many in the 772 pages of this OT version.
Here we have 3 separate short sentences, and it is the last two,
in this OT version a mere 8+13 = 21 words (26 in the KJV),
which are absolutely devastating.
We all know by now that the Lord God has promised his chosen-
selected-superior little darlings their own land, and here he is
again promising that it will be done, but how is he saying it?
Like this - "I will bring you back..." and "...until I have done...".
You see the importance? He is reserving the implementation
of that promise exclusively for himself.
The unspoken but obvious underlying message, and this must be
clearly understood, is that it is proscribed for humans, even for
his own people, to do anything to convert that promise into
reality. There is no other reasonable interpretation possible.
This brief sentence at a stroke nullifies and makes a mockery of
any and all human attempts and efforts to justify any recreation
of the ancient state of Israel on religious grounds (as the Lord is
speaking here, that state yet to be created and later destroyed).
In other words: no Jew, no matter how ultra-orthodox,
can claim any scriptural basis for driving the local Arabs
out, killing the men, women and children, and stealing
their land and water.
In other words: no Zionist, no matter how secular,
can claim any historical basis for colonising Palestine.
Whether they like it or not, the Jews must wait, patiently or
impatiently, however long it takes, wherever they happen to
be, for the Messiah first to arrive and then to put matters right.
It seems that only the small but vocal orthodox group Neturei
Karta (=the guardians of the city=al-Quds=Jerusalem) has
understood this, advocating and demanding the immediate
dissolution of the modern state of Israel (www.nkusa.org).
As the Jews expressly reject Jesus as the Messiah they should
stock up well and prepare for a long wait, in the wilderness, in
the diaspora, in exile, wherever - anywhere but Palestine.
Why do you think that Jews in certain prayers say:
"For our sins have we been exiled from our land" - ?
Why do you think that no serious rabbi has EVER advocated
plans for resurrecting the state of Israel?
Because they know that Judaism expressly proscribes it.
It is therefore clear that the Jews are well aware of this truly
debilitating restriction on their activities. The decent ones have
decided to abide by the rules and their own Law of Moses while
all the rest, in stupefying arrogance, simply ignore it.
As stated elsewhere, religion is probably best left entirely out of
the Israel-Palestine conflict as it only confuses the fundamental
issues, which are justice and the inalienable rights of the local
population faced with or forced out by incoming colonisers who
do not have any proven ties to the land (Gen.10), but if we MUST
bring religion into the equation, well, the above brief verse
shatters, destroys, demolishes, terminates and eradicates that
very religious aspect the moment the subject is raised.
But the Jews and the Zionists have not only forcibly resurrected
the state of Israel, they are hell-bent on expanding it well beyond
what international law, as expressed by the will of the newly-
formed United Nations on 29 November 1947, has at any time
authorised, by relentlessly establishing more and more facts on
the ground, with most of the whole offensive and idiotic
experiment paid for by nations whose impotent Zionist
sponsored-dominated-controlled "elected" leaders continue
to rob their sleeping taxpayers.
The modern state of Israel may be tiny but it is a fraud of colossal
proportions, and both in terms of the way in which it was
established and has been maintained ever since, is an affront
to civilised behaviour.
If that is the legal and material situation, what about the religious
aspects? On numerous occasions in the OT5, the God of Israel
carries out punishments which are completely out of proportion to
the trivial offences committed, in one case striking down 2 of the
4 sons of the high priest Aaron, older brother of Moses, because
of a simple procedural mistake at the altar (Lev.10:1-2) -
surely by any definition an over-zealous overkill.
Compared with the reaction to such a minor innocent accidental
infringement of the law, what will happen to the Israelites for
rebelling in the most outrageous and the most fundamental way
imaginable, in effect unilaterally tearing up the agreement with
their God by wilfully ignoring its most basic material premise?
Assuming that the God of Israel is still around, he must be
absolutely fuming by now, and if the Jews have not heard
anything from him for 6 decades or so, it is probably because
he is lost for words to express his disbelief and fury.
If there is any charge left between the two cherubim on the
mercy-cover (lid) of the box or ark of the covenant (Ex.25),
then we should expect to see not just a few sparks of anger
but a massive fireworks of uncontrollable rage erupting any
day now, and all non-Jews must thank their Creator that they
are not among the chosen-selected-superior ones.
Stand well clear and watch this space, because a space is
probably all that will be left when he has finished exacting his
just retribution from the Israelites. They, and the rest of the
world, were warned 3500 years ago but failed to take heed.
Interestingly, according to an old prophecy in rabbinic literature
called The Exile Under Ishmael, approximately 80 percent of
Israelites will, when the time is right, be driven out or killed.
Given that modern Israel's Arab population is approaching 20
percent, maybe the time is not far away for a major clean-up
operation, a sort of Passover in reverse, Jews only and this
way please. See also www.poems.ibraheem.dk >
The Exile Under Ishmael (No.028 on Index).
Should anyone still doubt whether we interpreted that verse
correctly or not, our patience was rewarded not only a 2nd time:
Deut.19:8 The Lord your God promised your fathers that he
would make your land larger. He will give you all the land that
he promised to give to your ancestors.
But also a 3rd and a 4th time: almost at the very end of the OT5
and shortly before the death of Moses, there is a wonderful
double confirmation that we are right, for nothing has changed,
he is still reserving the implementation of that promise
exclusively for himself:
Deut.30:3 Then the Lord your God will be kind to you.
The Lord your God will make you free again!
He will bring you back from the nations where he sent you.
Deut.30:4 Even if you were sent to the farthest parts of the
earth, the Lord your God will gather you from there and
bring you back.
And would you believe it, a 5th time: just before Moses dies,
the Lord shows him all of The Promised Land from Mount Nebo:
Deut.34:4 The Lord said to Moses,
This is the land I promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
I said to them, I will give this land to your descendants.
I have let you see the land, but you cannot go there.
The OT5 will throughout show the God of Israel to be a very
temperamental and unpredictable deity but as regards The
Promised Land at least he is wonderfully consistent, here for
the last time saying: "I will give this land...", as in all the
other cases clearly, strictly, categorically and absolutely
proscribing ANY human involvement in the process.
The above verses collectively state it at least 7 times with slight
variations, now add the others referenced earlier and we already
have more than 20 indisputable pronouncements straight from
the Lord, but there are plenty more. For a full list of the 84
(eightyfour) cases we found, see Appendix J2, and very
significantly we did not find one single verse contradicting them.
What are the legal definitions of "on the balance of probabilities"
and "beyond reasonable doubt"?
The implications are obvious:
ZIONIST COLONISERS OUT OF PALESTINE.
Combine this with our earlier findings (Gen.10) that, scripturally
speaking, neither Ashkenazi nor Mizrahi "Jews" are Semitic nor
Hebrew nor Jewish, and there is not very much left, is there?
We fully realise that this is the worst possible news for
ultra-orthodox Jews and arch-Zionists, for Christian Evangelicals
and neo-Crusaders, but that cannot be helped, we are not even
sorry, facts are facts and truth will out.
And before we move on, here are those 2 brief but all-important
sentences once more, in slightly larger type so even the above
mentioned groups may understand:
Gen.28:15 > I will bring you back to this land. I will
not leave you until I have done what I have promised.
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that Judaism explicitly forbids humans re-establishing Israel.
We found no less than 84 verses in the Five Books of Moses which
all tell the same story, and not one single verse contradicting it.
The consequences are clear: Zionist colonisers OUT of Palestine.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- Judaism explicitly forbids humans re-establishing Israel?
> Gen.28:15 + Deut.19:8 + Deut.30:3-4 + Appendix J2
(list of 84 cases)
And here is the proof:
(here we present only a few of those 84 verses but these are some
of the clearest and most emphatic and on their own are already
sufficient as proof but of course all the others reinforce the case)
Genesis 28
[Lord to Jacob:]
15 I am with you, and I will protect you everywhere you go.
I will bring you back to this land.
I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised.
And because this is ultra-important, here is the KJV:
KJV.Gen.28:15 And, behold, I am with thee, and will keep thee
in all places whither thou goest, and will bring thee again into
this land; for I will not leave thee, until I have done that which
I have spoken to thee of.
HA! WE GOT THEM NOW! We really have got them now -
we have found what we were sincerely hoping to find.
Read that again, and at least 3 times, for this, Gen.28:15, is
possibly the most important single verse out of the Yahweh-only-
knows-how-many in the 772 pages of this OT version.
Here we have 3 separate short sentences, and it is the last two,
in this OT version a mere 8+13 = 21 words (26 in the KJV),
which are absolutely devastating.
We all know by now that the Lord God has promised his chosen-
selected-superior little darlings their own land, and here he is
again promising that it will be done, but how is he saying it?
Like this - "I will bring you back..." and "...until I have done...".
You see the importance? He is reserving the implementation
of that promise exclusively for himself.
The unspoken but obvious underlying message, and this must be
clearly understood, is that it is proscribed for humans, even for
his own people, to do anything to convert that promise into
reality. There is no other reasonable interpretation possible.
This brief sentence at a stroke nullifies and makes a mockery of
any and all human attempts and efforts to justify any recreation
of the ancient state of Israel on religious grounds (as the Lord is
speaking here, that state yet to be created and later destroyed).
In other words: no Jew, no matter how ultra-orthodox,
can claim any scriptural basis for driving the local Arabs
out, killing the men, women and children, and stealing
their land and water.
In other words: no Zionist, no matter how secular,
can claim any historical basis for colonising Palestine.
Whether they like it or not, the Jews must wait, patiently or
impatiently, however long it takes, wherever they happen to
be, for the Messiah first to arrive and then to put matters right.
It seems that only the small but vocal orthodox group Neturei
Karta (=the guardians of the city=al-Quds=Jerusalem) has
understood this, advocating and demanding the immediate
dissolution of the modern state of Israel (www.nkusa.org).
As the Jews expressly reject Jesus as the Messiah they should
stock up well and prepare for a long wait, in the wilderness, in
the diaspora, in exile, wherever - anywhere but Palestine.
Why do you think that Jews in certain prayers say:
"For our sins have we been exiled from our land" - ?
Why do you think that no serious rabbi has EVER advocated
plans for resurrecting the state of Israel?
Because they know that Judaism expressly proscribes it.
It is therefore clear that the Jews are well aware of this truly
debilitating restriction on their activities. The decent ones have
decided to abide by the rules and their own Law of Moses while
all the rest, in stupefying arrogance, simply ignore it.
As stated elsewhere, religion is probably best left entirely out of
the Israel-Palestine conflict as it only confuses the fundamental
issues, which are justice and the inalienable rights of the local
population faced with or forced out by incoming colonisers who
do not have any proven ties to the land (Gen.10), but if we MUST
bring religion into the equation, well, the above brief verse
shatters, destroys, demolishes, terminates and eradicates that
very religious aspect the moment the subject is raised.
But the Jews and the Zionists have not only forcibly resurrected
the state of Israel, they are hell-bent on expanding it well beyond
what international law, as expressed by the will of the newly-
formed United Nations on 29 November 1947, has at any time
authorised, by relentlessly establishing more and more facts on
the ground, with most of the whole offensive and idiotic
experiment paid for by nations whose impotent Zionist
sponsored-dominated-controlled "elected" leaders continue
to rob their sleeping taxpayers.
The modern state of Israel may be tiny but it is a fraud of colossal
proportions, and both in terms of the way in which it was
established and has been maintained ever since, is an affront
to civilised behaviour.
If that is the legal and material situation, what about the religious
aspects? On numerous occasions in the OT5, the God of Israel
carries out punishments which are completely out of proportion to
the trivial offences committed, in one case striking down 2 of the
4 sons of the high priest Aaron, older brother of Moses, because
of a simple procedural mistake at the altar (Lev.10:1-2) -
surely by any definition an over-zealous overkill.
Compared with the reaction to such a minor innocent accidental
infringement of the law, what will happen to the Israelites for
rebelling in the most outrageous and the most fundamental way
imaginable, in effect unilaterally tearing up the agreement with
their God by wilfully ignoring its most basic material premise?
Assuming that the God of Israel is still around, he must be
absolutely fuming by now, and if the Jews have not heard
anything from him for 6 decades or so, it is probably because
he is lost for words to express his disbelief and fury.
If there is any charge left between the two cherubim on the
mercy-cover (lid) of the box or ark of the covenant (Ex.25),
then we should expect to see not just a few sparks of anger
but a massive fireworks of uncontrollable rage erupting any
day now, and all non-Jews must thank their Creator that they
are not among the chosen-selected-superior ones.
Stand well clear and watch this space, because a space is
probably all that will be left when he has finished exacting his
just retribution from the Israelites. They, and the rest of the
world, were warned 3500 years ago but failed to take heed.
Interestingly, according to an old prophecy in rabbinic literature
called The Exile Under Ishmael, approximately 80 percent of
Israelites will, when the time is right, be driven out or killed.
Given that modern Israel's Arab population is approaching 20
percent, maybe the time is not far away for a major clean-up
operation, a sort of Passover in reverse, Jews only and this
way please. See also www.poems.ibraheem.dk >
The Exile Under Ishmael (No.028 on Index).
Should anyone still doubt whether we interpreted that verse
correctly or not, our patience was rewarded not only a 2nd time:
Deut.19:8 The Lord your God promised your fathers that he
would make your land larger. He will give you all the land that
he promised to give to your ancestors.
But also a 3rd and a 4th time: almost at the very end of the OT5
and shortly before the death of Moses, there is a wonderful
double confirmation that we are right, for nothing has changed,
he is still reserving the implementation of that promise
exclusively for himself:
Deut.30:3 Then the Lord your God will be kind to you.
The Lord your God will make you free again!
He will bring you back from the nations where he sent you.
Deut.30:4 Even if you were sent to the farthest parts of the
earth, the Lord your God will gather you from there and
bring you back.
And would you believe it, a 5th time: just before Moses dies,
the Lord shows him all of The Promised Land from Mount Nebo:
Deut.34:4 The Lord said to Moses,
This is the land I promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
I said to them, I will give this land to your descendants.
I have let you see the land, but you cannot go there.
The OT5 will throughout show the God of Israel to be a very
temperamental and unpredictable deity but as regards The
Promised Land at least he is wonderfully consistent, here for
the last time saying: "I will give this land...", as in all the
other cases clearly, strictly, categorically and absolutely
proscribing ANY human involvement in the process.
The above verses collectively state it at least 7 times with slight
variations, now add the others referenced earlier and we already
have more than 20 indisputable pronouncements straight from
the Lord, but there are plenty more. For a full list of the 84
(eightyfour) cases we found, see Appendix J2, and very
significantly we did not find one single verse contradicting them.
What are the legal definitions of "on the balance of probabilities"
and "beyond reasonable doubt"?
The implications are obvious:
ZIONIST COLONISERS OUT OF PALESTINE.
Combine this with our earlier findings (Gen.10) that, scripturally
speaking, neither Ashkenazi nor Mizrahi "Jews" are Semitic nor
Hebrew nor Jewish, and there is not very much left, is there?
We fully realise that this is the worst possible news for
ultra-orthodox Jews and arch-Zionists, for Christian Evangelicals
and neo-Crusaders, but that cannot be helped, we are not even
sorry, facts are facts and truth will out.
And before we move on, here are those 2 brief but all-important
sentences once more, in slightly larger type so even the above
mentioned groups may understand:
Gen.28:15 > I will bring you back to this land. I will
not leave you until I have done what I have promised.
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
18 February 2011
Example J3
Judaism commands human sacrifice.
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that Judaism commands human sacrifice, to the God of Israel
Yahweh, who thereby indisputably is revealed to be the Jewish
equivalent of the Canaanite's Moloch, who is repeatedly and
absolutely condemned in the Law of Moses not only as a horrible
monster but also as a false god. It takes one to know one...
You may have to read that again, and slowly, but it is a sad
and dreadful undeniable fact of Judaism, until now generally
regarded as a dignified and noble religion. But truth will out.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- Judaism commands human sacrifice?
> Lev.27:28-29
And here is the proof:
Leviticus 27
Special Gifts
28 There is a special kind of gift that people give to the Lord.
It belongs only to him, and it cannot be bought back or sold.
This gift belongs to the Lord. This type of gift includes people,
animals, and fields from the family property.
[ERV note to 27:28 - "special kind of gift" This usually
means things taken in war. These things (gifts) belonged
only to the Lord, so they could not be used for anything else.]
29 If this gift is a person, that person cannot
be bought back. That person must be killed.
This is serious, very very serious and very very important,
so here the KJV for comparison:
KJV.Lev.27:28 Notwithstanding no devoted thing, that a man
shall devote unto the LORD of all that he hath, both of man
and beast, and of the field of his possession, shall be sold or
redeemed: every devoted thing is most holy unto the LORD.
KJV.Lev.27:29 None devoted, which shall be devoted of
men, shall be redeemed; but shall surely be put to death.
In plain language the above 2 verses not only permit and
tolerate, encourage and advocate, but STIPULATE AND COMMAND
HUMAN SACRIFICE. This is therefore an integral part of the Law
of Moses, of Judaism, of what it means to be Jewish, and unless
Jews officially repudiate these aspects of Judaism, and remove
those profoundly offensive verses from their scriptures, no form
of words, however clever, will ever conceal the ghastly truth:
JUDAISM COMMANDS HUMAN SACRIFICE AS A SPECIAL GIFT TO
THE GOD OF ISRAEL, YAHWEH. HALLELUJAH - MOLOCH LIVES!
May we hear no more accusations that Islam is barbaric!
Note also the wording in v.28 above "that people give to the
Lord". This is ambiguous: does it mean MUST they give or is it
only an option for those with plenty of such goods to give?
Were there any sub-rules regarding percentages that must or
should be given to Yahweh? Very hazy and very unsatisfactory,
and quite unlike the detailed instructions for making sacrifices.
And we must demand an answer to the disturbing question:
How many innocent vanquished men, women and children were
sacrificed for this purpose since this statute was laid down?
What a sinful waste of human lives. What a benighted and evil
cult of death. And yet we must have the courage to say it, and
say it loud: THIS IS JUDAISM. Yes, this really is JUDAISM!
And, by extension, this is also Christianity, as Jesus himself
wholeheartedly endorses the entire law of Moses, see
THIS IS CHRISTIANITY (NT.Mt.5:17-18 + NT.Lk.16:17).
And corresponding perfectly with these truly Satanic verses,
we must mention here a news story from late 2009:
A radical-fanatical-extremist West Bank rabbi (read: land-
grabbing illegal settler) by the name of Yitzhak Shapira published
a book co-authored by a Yossi Elitzur called The King's Torah in
which he argues the theological case, based of course on the
Torah and Talmud, for justifying Jews killing and eradicating
anyone perceived to be an actual or a potential threat to Israel,
even babies and children who would likely grow up to hate Israel,
and anyone violating any of the commandments in the Torah.
The book and its inherent decree to commit murder and, if
deemed necessary, genocide, is backed by several Israeli rabbis
including Yitzhak Ginsburg and Yaakov Yosef, who have
apparently recommended it to their students.
The similarity with the Nazi superiority complex is painfully
obvious and hugely embarrassing for Judaism.
Was Shapira arrested or even questioned about those grotesque
and obscene utterances?
There is a very disturbing parallel with Christian radical-fanatical-
extremists:
Many American televangelists have used totally outrageous
language in describing Islam, for example Rod Parsley, who has
openly declared (words to the effect) that "part of America's
divine mission is to wage war on and destroy the false religion
of Islam" and that Muhammad (peace be upon him) "was the
mouthpiece of a conspiracy of spiritual evil".
Was Parsley arrested or even questioned about those grotesque
and obscene utterances?
Just think about it:
What would happen if ANY Muslim, scholar or imam or whatever,
stood up and said anything like that about Jews and Christians,
or about anyone else for that matter, or wrote a book expressing
such sentiments? Extraordinary rendition and secret indefinite
detention without trial, or at the very least immediate arrest and
charges of glorifying terrorism and inciting hatred and violence.
But, conforming to the nauseating hypocrisy of the Judeo-
Christian West, when Jews and Christians and atheists do it,
it is reluctantly and minimally reported and swiftly forgotten,
or completely ignored, and not immediately seized upon as
unacceptable, inflammatory, verbal terrorism and so on.
YET THAT IS WHAT IT IS AND IT MUST STOP - AND NOW.
Compare with the simplicity and purity of Islam!
May we hear no more accusations that Islam is barbaric!
May we hear no more accusations that Islam is dogmatic!
May we hear no more accusations that Islam is dangerous!
May we hear no more criticism of dhimmis in Islam!
May we hear no more criticism of prophet Muhammad!
May we hear no more criticism of the Quran!
May we hear no more criticism of Islam!
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that Judaism commands human sacrifice, to the God of Israel
Yahweh, who thereby indisputably is revealed to be the Jewish
equivalent of the Canaanite's Moloch, who is repeatedly and
absolutely condemned in the Law of Moses not only as a horrible
monster but also as a false god. It takes one to know one...
You may have to read that again, and slowly, but it is a sad
and dreadful undeniable fact of Judaism, until now generally
regarded as a dignified and noble religion. But truth will out.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- Judaism commands human sacrifice?
> Lev.27:28-29
And here is the proof:
Leviticus 27
Special Gifts
28 There is a special kind of gift that people give to the Lord.
It belongs only to him, and it cannot be bought back or sold.
This gift belongs to the Lord. This type of gift includes people,
animals, and fields from the family property.
[ERV note to 27:28 - "special kind of gift" This usually
means things taken in war. These things (gifts) belonged
only to the Lord, so they could not be used for anything else.]
29 If this gift is a person, that person cannot
be bought back. That person must be killed.
This is serious, very very serious and very very important,
so here the KJV for comparison:
KJV.Lev.27:28 Notwithstanding no devoted thing, that a man
shall devote unto the LORD of all that he hath, both of man
and beast, and of the field of his possession, shall be sold or
redeemed: every devoted thing is most holy unto the LORD.
KJV.Lev.27:29 None devoted, which shall be devoted of
men, shall be redeemed; but shall surely be put to death.
In plain language the above 2 verses not only permit and
tolerate, encourage and advocate, but STIPULATE AND COMMAND
HUMAN SACRIFICE. This is therefore an integral part of the Law
of Moses, of Judaism, of what it means to be Jewish, and unless
Jews officially repudiate these aspects of Judaism, and remove
those profoundly offensive verses from their scriptures, no form
of words, however clever, will ever conceal the ghastly truth:
JUDAISM COMMANDS HUMAN SACRIFICE AS A SPECIAL GIFT TO
THE GOD OF ISRAEL, YAHWEH. HALLELUJAH - MOLOCH LIVES!
May we hear no more accusations that Islam is barbaric!
Note also the wording in v.28 above "that people give to the
Lord". This is ambiguous: does it mean MUST they give or is it
only an option for those with plenty of such goods to give?
Were there any sub-rules regarding percentages that must or
should be given to Yahweh? Very hazy and very unsatisfactory,
and quite unlike the detailed instructions for making sacrifices.
And we must demand an answer to the disturbing question:
How many innocent vanquished men, women and children were
sacrificed for this purpose since this statute was laid down?
What a sinful waste of human lives. What a benighted and evil
cult of death. And yet we must have the courage to say it, and
say it loud: THIS IS JUDAISM. Yes, this really is JUDAISM!
And, by extension, this is also Christianity, as Jesus himself
wholeheartedly endorses the entire law of Moses, see
THIS IS CHRISTIANITY (NT.Mt.5:17-18 + NT.Lk.16:17).
And corresponding perfectly with these truly Satanic verses,
we must mention here a news story from late 2009:
A radical-fanatical-extremist West Bank rabbi (read: land-
grabbing illegal settler) by the name of Yitzhak Shapira published
a book co-authored by a Yossi Elitzur called The King's Torah in
which he argues the theological case, based of course on the
Torah and Talmud, for justifying Jews killing and eradicating
anyone perceived to be an actual or a potential threat to Israel,
even babies and children who would likely grow up to hate Israel,
and anyone violating any of the commandments in the Torah.
The book and its inherent decree to commit murder and, if
deemed necessary, genocide, is backed by several Israeli rabbis
including Yitzhak Ginsburg and Yaakov Yosef, who have
apparently recommended it to their students.
The similarity with the Nazi superiority complex is painfully
obvious and hugely embarrassing for Judaism.
Was Shapira arrested or even questioned about those grotesque
and obscene utterances?
There is a very disturbing parallel with Christian radical-fanatical-
extremists:
Many American televangelists have used totally outrageous
language in describing Islam, for example Rod Parsley, who has
openly declared (words to the effect) that "part of America's
divine mission is to wage war on and destroy the false religion
of Islam" and that Muhammad (peace be upon him) "was the
mouthpiece of a conspiracy of spiritual evil".
Was Parsley arrested or even questioned about those grotesque
and obscene utterances?
Just think about it:
What would happen if ANY Muslim, scholar or imam or whatever,
stood up and said anything like that about Jews and Christians,
or about anyone else for that matter, or wrote a book expressing
such sentiments? Extraordinary rendition and secret indefinite
detention without trial, or at the very least immediate arrest and
charges of glorifying terrorism and inciting hatred and violence.
But, conforming to the nauseating hypocrisy of the Judeo-
Christian West, when Jews and Christians and atheists do it,
it is reluctantly and minimally reported and swiftly forgotten,
or completely ignored, and not immediately seized upon as
unacceptable, inflammatory, verbal terrorism and so on.
YET THAT IS WHAT IT IS AND IT MUST STOP - AND NOW.
Compare with the simplicity and purity of Islam!
May we hear no more accusations that Islam is barbaric!
May we hear no more accusations that Islam is dogmatic!
May we hear no more accusations that Islam is dangerous!
May we hear no more criticism of dhimmis in Islam!
May we hear no more criticism of prophet Muhammad!
May we hear no more criticism of the Quran!
May we hear no more criticism of Islam!
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
17 February 2011
Example C1
Jesus forfeits his own right to eternal life.
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that Jesus forfeits his own right to eternal life, for he states
that in order to have eternal life we must obey the Law of Moses,
which he breaks himself repeatedly. Most amusing.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- Jesus forfeits his right to eternal life?
> Mt.19:17 + Mt.5:39 + Mt.5:44 + (Mt.26:26-28 + Jn.6:53-59)
And here is the proof:
Matthew 19
A Rich Man Refuses to Follow Jesus
(Mk. 10:17-31; Lk. 18:18-30)
16 A man came to Jesus and asked,
Teacher, what good thing must I do to have eternal life?
17 Jesus answered, Why do you ask me about what is good?
Only God is good. But if you want to have eternal life,
obey the law’s commands.
Here Jesus clearly does NOT see himself as God, nor as good for
that matter, it really is confusing, sometimes he is, sometimes
he is not... How about some clarity and certainty?
But that is a minor matter compared with this:
His exhortation to "obey the law’s commands" is clearly a case
of "do as I say and not as I do" for Jesus, the radical extremist,
rarely misses an opportunity to turn that very law on its head.
We have caught Jesus here, and in the biggest possible way, and
the issue is this: if the above statement is true then clearly Jesus,
whom the NT4 indisputably shows to be in serial breach of some
of the most fundamental provisions of the Law of Moses, has
forfeited his right to "eternal life" – and will all Christians please
read that again, and slowly.
Alternatively, if the above statement is NOT true then we cannot
trust anything that Jesus is reported to have said and in that
case, to put it bluntly, why bother reading the Gospels at all?
It is a stark and unpleasant choice for Christians to have to make.
But that is not our problem.
May we hear no more criticism of prophet Muhammad!
May we hear no more criticism of the Quran!
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that Jesus forfeits his own right to eternal life, for he states
that in order to have eternal life we must obey the Law of Moses,
which he breaks himself repeatedly. Most amusing.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- Jesus forfeits his right to eternal life?
> Mt.19:17 + Mt.5:39 + Mt.5:44 + (Mt.26:26-28 + Jn.6:53-59)
And here is the proof:
Matthew 19
A Rich Man Refuses to Follow Jesus
(Mk. 10:17-31; Lk. 18:18-30)
16 A man came to Jesus and asked,
Teacher, what good thing must I do to have eternal life?
17 Jesus answered, Why do you ask me about what is good?
Only God is good. But if you want to have eternal life,
obey the law’s commands.
Here Jesus clearly does NOT see himself as God, nor as good for
that matter, it really is confusing, sometimes he is, sometimes
he is not... How about some clarity and certainty?
But that is a minor matter compared with this:
His exhortation to "obey the law’s commands" is clearly a case
of "do as I say and not as I do" for Jesus, the radical extremist,
rarely misses an opportunity to turn that very law on its head.
We have caught Jesus here, and in the biggest possible way, and
the issue is this: if the above statement is true then clearly Jesus,
whom the NT4 indisputably shows to be in serial breach of some
of the most fundamental provisions of the Law of Moses, has
forfeited his right to "eternal life" – and will all Christians please
read that again, and slowly.
Alternatively, if the above statement is NOT true then we cannot
trust anything that Jesus is reported to have said and in that
case, to put it bluntly, why bother reading the Gospels at all?
It is a stark and unpleasant choice for Christians to have to make.
But that is not our problem.
May we hear no more criticism of prophet Muhammad!
May we hear no more criticism of the Quran!
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
16 February 2011
Example C2
Jesus DOES claim to be the Son of God.
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that, although denied by Muslims, Jesus DOES claim to be the
son of God for we found no less than 31 verses in the 4 Gospels
that confirm it, and there are many more waiting to be listed.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- Jesus DOES claim to be the son of God?
> Appendix C2 (list of 31 cases)
This is Appendix C2:
Appendix C2
Christianity - List of 31 Jesus Son of God verses
Verses of the NT4 (The Gospels) where Jesus claims,
directly or indirectly, to be the Son of God:
Matthew:
10:32 - 10:33 - 11:27 - 12:50 - 15:13 - 16:17 - 16:27 -
18:19 - 18:35 - 24:36 - 26:39 - 26:42 - 26:53 - 26:64
Mark:
14:62 - 15:2
Luke:
22:70 - 23:46
John:
6:27 - 6:46 - 10:36 - 10:37 – 11:4 - 14:6 - 14:7 - 14:13 -
15:23 - 15:24 - 17:1 - 17:2 - 17:5
31 (thirtyone) in total so far, and there are many more,
John is full of them.
Should anyone take the time to perform a thorough and
complete count, do please let us know the final score.
Probably over 100 times.
And here is the proof:
(here we present only a few of those 31 verses but these are some
of the clearest and most emphatic and on their own are already
sufficient as proof but of course all the others reinforce the case)
(verses and lines present in the book at this place but not relevant
to this argument have been left out here)
Matthew 26
63 But Jesus said nothing. Again the high priest
said to Jesus, You are now under oath. I command
you by the power of the living God to tell us the truth.
Tell us, are you the Christ, the Son of God?
64 Jesus answered, Yes, that’s right.
...
Mark 14
Mk.14:61 But Jesus said nothing to answer him.
The high priest asked Jesus another question:
Are you the Christ, the Son of the blessed God?
Mk.14:62 Jesus answered, Yes, I am the Son of God.
...
Luke 22
Lk.22:70 They all said, Then are you the Son of God?
Jesus said to them, You are right in saying that I am.
...
Note that initially Jesus says nothing. This will be addressed
shortly (Mt.27:11-14).
Calling all Muslims: here Jesus answers in the affirmative,
in 3 of the 4 Gospels, and the KJV agrees, that YES he is,
meaning claims to be, Christ, the son of God
(Christ from Greek: christo=messiah=the anointed=the king).
That is 3 more for the list then, see Appendix C2.
John, annoyingly, is silent on this particular question at this
particular point BUT in an earlier session of arguing with the
Jewish leaders he reports Jesus as saying:
John 10
Jn.10:36 So why do you accuse me of insulting God
for saying, ‘I am God’s Son’?
I am the one God chose and sent into the world.
Jn.10:37 If I don’t do what my Father does,
then don’t believe what I say.
That is 2 more son of God verses for the list, see Appendix C2.
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that, although denied by Muslims, Jesus DOES claim to be the
son of God for we found no less than 31 verses in the 4 Gospels
that confirm it, and there are many more waiting to be listed.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- Jesus DOES claim to be the son of God?
> Appendix C2 (list of 31 cases)
This is Appendix C2:
Appendix C2
Christianity - List of 31 Jesus Son of God verses
Verses of the NT4 (The Gospels) where Jesus claims,
directly or indirectly, to be the Son of God:
Matthew:
10:32 - 10:33 - 11:27 - 12:50 - 15:13 - 16:17 - 16:27 -
18:19 - 18:35 - 24:36 - 26:39 - 26:42 - 26:53 - 26:64
Mark:
14:62 - 15:2
Luke:
22:70 - 23:46
John:
6:27 - 6:46 - 10:36 - 10:37 – 11:4 - 14:6 - 14:7 - 14:13 -
15:23 - 15:24 - 17:1 - 17:2 - 17:5
31 (thirtyone) in total so far, and there are many more,
John is full of them.
Should anyone take the time to perform a thorough and
complete count, do please let us know the final score.
Probably over 100 times.
And here is the proof:
(here we present only a few of those 31 verses but these are some
of the clearest and most emphatic and on their own are already
sufficient as proof but of course all the others reinforce the case)
(verses and lines present in the book at this place but not relevant
to this argument have been left out here)
Matthew 26
63 But Jesus said nothing. Again the high priest
said to Jesus, You are now under oath. I command
you by the power of the living God to tell us the truth.
Tell us, are you the Christ, the Son of God?
64 Jesus answered, Yes, that’s right.
...
Mark 14
Mk.14:61 But Jesus said nothing to answer him.
The high priest asked Jesus another question:
Are you the Christ, the Son of the blessed God?
Mk.14:62 Jesus answered, Yes, I am the Son of God.
...
Luke 22
Lk.22:70 They all said, Then are you the Son of God?
Jesus said to them, You are right in saying that I am.
...
Note that initially Jesus says nothing. This will be addressed
shortly (Mt.27:11-14).
Calling all Muslims: here Jesus answers in the affirmative,
in 3 of the 4 Gospels, and the KJV agrees, that YES he is,
meaning claims to be, Christ, the son of God
(Christ from Greek: christo=messiah=the anointed=the king).
That is 3 more for the list then, see Appendix C2.
John, annoyingly, is silent on this particular question at this
particular point BUT in an earlier session of arguing with the
Jewish leaders he reports Jesus as saying:
John 10
Jn.10:36 So why do you accuse me of insulting God
for saying, ‘I am God’s Son’?
I am the one God chose and sent into the world.
Jn.10:37 If I don’t do what my Father does,
then don’t believe what I say.
That is 2 more son of God verses for the list, see Appendix C2.
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
15 February 2011
Example C3
Jesus wishes you a horrible death if you reject his message.
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that Jesus wishes you a horrible death for no other reason than
rejecting his message, namely that you may perish in a holocaust
worse than the one inflicted upon Sodom and Gomorrah.
So much for the Prince of Peace. Lies, all lies.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- Jesus wishes you a horrible death if you reject his message?
> Mt.10:13-15 + Mt.21:44 + Mt.25:41-46 + (Mt.11:20-24 +
Lk.10:10-15)
(only 1 of the 5 verses below, Mt.10:15, is crucial but the
other 4 are required to set the scene)
And here is the proof:
Matthew 10
[Jesus to followers:]
11 When you enter a city or town, find some worthy
person there and stay in his home until you leave.
12 When you enter that home, say, Peace be with you.
Also known as: as-salaamualaikum! According to Islam, this
is the greeting that all the prophets always used, from the very
first one, Azzam (=Adam), to the last one, Muhammad, and
may the peace they wished us be upon them all.
Muslims universally greet all we meet like this, surely a very
civilised gesture.
The following 3 verses are possibly the most revealing of all
in the entire NT4 and therefore absolutely central to a proper
understanding of Jesus, Christianity and the behaviour of
Christians down the ages, so read them carefully.
13 If the people in that home welcome you, they are worthy
of your peace. May they have the peace you wished for them.
But if they don’t welcome you, they are not worthy of
your peace. Take back the peace you wished for them.
14 And if the people in a home or a town refuse to welcome
you or listen to you, then leave that place and shake the
dust off your feet.
15 I can assure you that on the judgment day
it will be worse for that town than for
the people of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Because they are so important, here are the same verses from
the KJV, and we see that this old trusted version says the same:
KJV.Mt.10:13 And if the house be worthy, let your peace come
upon it: but if it be not worthy, let your peace return to you.
KJV.Mt.10:14 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear
your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake
off the dust of your feet.
KJV.Mt.10:15 Verily I say unto you, It shall be more
tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the
day of judgment, than for that city.
On browsing through the NT years ago these verses caught my
attention and told me that something was wrong with either the
NT or with Jesus-Christianity or both.
These sentiments do not appear in Mark and John, nor are they
contradicted, but they appear almost word for word in Luke
(Lk.10:10-15), although Luke's version is mixed up with Jesus'
next outburst, in Mt.11:20-24, so we quote Luke there.
There are no alternative interpretations possible, no mitigating
circumstances, so let us be clear about this:
Here Jesus condemns whole towns and their inhabitants
to a horrible death for no other reason than (maybe only
a few of them) rejecting his message.
Please read that again, and 10 times if you are a Christian.
It is no use Christians pointing out the places where he heals
and comforts and feeds people - the above is totally outrageous,
profoundly pathological and negates all the positives.
To instruct his followers to take back the peace they had wished
their hosts on his behalf is already beyond the acceptable for any
prophet, all supposedly magnanimous and philosophical persons.
It is also counter-productive, after all, having wished them well,
why not leave those kind wishes behind as a goodwill gesture
which just might make those people think again and so maybe
be more receptive another time?
Sowing today for a future harvest, to paraphrase Jesus himself.
But to wish all those good and innocent people dead is horrific
and barbaric and simply unforgivable.
Henceforth, the Prince of Peace is a myth, a fairytale, a marketing
ploy (probably by Paul, Christianity's leading spin doctor and PR-
guru), a modification of the truth, also known as a downright lie,
and he should be known as the King of Death.
This is not an over-reaction on my part, although I am one of
those who rejected his message, so am directly affected as Jesus
clearly wishes me dead, gone and eradicated.
I am feeling persecuted and threatened now and am considering
a multi-billion-euro lawsuit against Christianity as represented by
the Vatican, as it is demonstrably a clear and present danger to
my health and happiness, not to mention my inalienable right to
religious freedom, and I am not joking.
Over the past 2000 years, how many millions were forcibly
converted or killed in the sacred names of the Father, the Son
and the Holy Spirit?
And it is reasonable, indeed it is obvious, to make the connection
and claim that born-again Christian monsters like GW Bush and
Co ("Submit to the Zionist International New World Order's
Western Corporate Totalitarianism or be wiped out!") get their
most evil and deranged ideas from the NT.
As presented in the NT4, Jesus can only fairly be described as
a psychopathic killer looking for fresh victims, inventing any
pathetic little excuse to blow innocent men, women and children
to bits. Is that why Christians are so eager to bomb and maim
and kill around the world? Is this their justification? Is this their
role model and their hero? Judging by many a sermon by many a
televangelist, the answer, tragically but not surprisingly, is: YES.
In the name of civilised behaviour, we must therefore demand
the immediate removal of such deeply offensive and outrageous
passages from all existing and future copies of the NT4, before
another insane world (mis)leader goes berserk, probably on Iran.
So much for the Hallelujah-brigade's claims that the Gospels are
bringing the Good News - HA! What a sick joke.
Now compare the reaction of Jesus with that of his predecessor
Abraham back in OT.Gen.18:32 and answer the following simple
but very important question: who is the better person?
These pathological outbursts cannot be explained away by his
contemporary followers by saying that Jesus must have had a
bad day, or similar. There are fundamental issues about the
very nature of Christianity to be confronted here.
Maybe the current Pope, Benedict 16, brilliant theologian and
intellectual, could help us all out? And urgently please.
May we hear no more criticism of the Quran!
May we hear no more criticism of prophet Muhammad!
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
The Foreword makes the claim:
> that Jesus wishes you a horrible death for no other reason than
rejecting his message, namely that you may perish in a holocaust
worse than the one inflicted upon Sodom and Gomorrah.
So much for the Prince of Peace. Lies, all lies.
The Did You Know section lists the following verses:
- Jesus wishes you a horrible death if you reject his message?
> Mt.10:13-15 + Mt.21:44 + Mt.25:41-46 + (Mt.11:20-24 +
Lk.10:10-15)
(only 1 of the 5 verses below, Mt.10:15, is crucial but the
other 4 are required to set the scene)
And here is the proof:
Matthew 10
[Jesus to followers:]
11 When you enter a city or town, find some worthy
person there and stay in his home until you leave.
12 When you enter that home, say, Peace be with you.
Also known as: as-salaamualaikum! According to Islam, this
is the greeting that all the prophets always used, from the very
first one, Azzam (=Adam), to the last one, Muhammad, and
may the peace they wished us be upon them all.
Muslims universally greet all we meet like this, surely a very
civilised gesture.
The following 3 verses are possibly the most revealing of all
in the entire NT4 and therefore absolutely central to a proper
understanding of Jesus, Christianity and the behaviour of
Christians down the ages, so read them carefully.
13 If the people in that home welcome you, they are worthy
of your peace. May they have the peace you wished for them.
But if they don’t welcome you, they are not worthy of
your peace. Take back the peace you wished for them.
14 And if the people in a home or a town refuse to welcome
you or listen to you, then leave that place and shake the
dust off your feet.
15 I can assure you that on the judgment day
it will be worse for that town than for
the people of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Because they are so important, here are the same verses from
the KJV, and we see that this old trusted version says the same:
KJV.Mt.10:13 And if the house be worthy, let your peace come
upon it: but if it be not worthy, let your peace return to you.
KJV.Mt.10:14 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear
your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake
off the dust of your feet.
KJV.Mt.10:15 Verily I say unto you, It shall be more
tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the
day of judgment, than for that city.
On browsing through the NT years ago these verses caught my
attention and told me that something was wrong with either the
NT or with Jesus-Christianity or both.
These sentiments do not appear in Mark and John, nor are they
contradicted, but they appear almost word for word in Luke
(Lk.10:10-15), although Luke's version is mixed up with Jesus'
next outburst, in Mt.11:20-24, so we quote Luke there.
There are no alternative interpretations possible, no mitigating
circumstances, so let us be clear about this:
Here Jesus condemns whole towns and their inhabitants
to a horrible death for no other reason than (maybe only
a few of them) rejecting his message.
Please read that again, and 10 times if you are a Christian.
It is no use Christians pointing out the places where he heals
and comforts and feeds people - the above is totally outrageous,
profoundly pathological and negates all the positives.
To instruct his followers to take back the peace they had wished
their hosts on his behalf is already beyond the acceptable for any
prophet, all supposedly magnanimous and philosophical persons.
It is also counter-productive, after all, having wished them well,
why not leave those kind wishes behind as a goodwill gesture
which just might make those people think again and so maybe
be more receptive another time?
Sowing today for a future harvest, to paraphrase Jesus himself.
But to wish all those good and innocent people dead is horrific
and barbaric and simply unforgivable.
Henceforth, the Prince of Peace is a myth, a fairytale, a marketing
ploy (probably by Paul, Christianity's leading spin doctor and PR-
guru), a modification of the truth, also known as a downright lie,
and he should be known as the King of Death.
This is not an over-reaction on my part, although I am one of
those who rejected his message, so am directly affected as Jesus
clearly wishes me dead, gone and eradicated.
I am feeling persecuted and threatened now and am considering
a multi-billion-euro lawsuit against Christianity as represented by
the Vatican, as it is demonstrably a clear and present danger to
my health and happiness, not to mention my inalienable right to
religious freedom, and I am not joking.
Over the past 2000 years, how many millions were forcibly
converted or killed in the sacred names of the Father, the Son
and the Holy Spirit?
And it is reasonable, indeed it is obvious, to make the connection
and claim that born-again Christian monsters like GW Bush and
Co ("Submit to the Zionist International New World Order's
Western Corporate Totalitarianism or be wiped out!") get their
most evil and deranged ideas from the NT.
As presented in the NT4, Jesus can only fairly be described as
a psychopathic killer looking for fresh victims, inventing any
pathetic little excuse to blow innocent men, women and children
to bits. Is that why Christians are so eager to bomb and maim
and kill around the world? Is this their justification? Is this their
role model and their hero? Judging by many a sermon by many a
televangelist, the answer, tragically but not surprisingly, is: YES.
In the name of civilised behaviour, we must therefore demand
the immediate removal of such deeply offensive and outrageous
passages from all existing and future copies of the NT4, before
another insane world (mis)leader goes berserk, probably on Iran.
So much for the Hallelujah-brigade's claims that the Gospels are
bringing the Good News - HA! What a sick joke.
Now compare the reaction of Jesus with that of his predecessor
Abraham back in OT.Gen.18:32 and answer the following simple
but very important question: who is the better person?
These pathological outbursts cannot be explained away by his
contemporary followers by saying that Jesus must have had a
bad day, or similar. There are fundamental issues about the
very nature of Christianity to be confronted here.
Maybe the current Pope, Benedict 16, brilliant theologian and
intellectual, could help us all out? And urgently please.
May we hear no more criticism of the Quran!
May we hear no more criticism of prophet Muhammad!
*
Unless otherwise stated, all Bible quotes are
Taken from the HOLY BIBLE: EASY-TO-READ VERSION™
© 2006 by World Bible Translation Center, Inc.
and used by permission
Remaining Bible quotes are taken from
The Authorised King James Version (public domain)
Quran quotes are taken from
The Noble Quran © 1996 Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Riyadh, KSA
*
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)